

To the naysayers who claim there is "no difference" between Racine mayoral candidates John Dickert and Bob Turner, you're all wet.
Yes, both are Democrats. I think that's where the similarity ends, though. Because two people are members of the same political party, it doesn't mean that one isn't a "be-er" and the other a "do-er."
I learned that in the legislature. I expected to be surrounded by motivated "do-ers," people excited to be there and to enrich and enhance the quality of life in our state. Well, no secret here, I was sorely disappointed.
Racine has a big choice to make in May. Do they bring on a "do-er" like John Dickert, or do they elect a "be-er" like Bob Turner? To illustrate my labels, here are a few examples from the recent debate held at Gateway. Note the reliance Turner places on his "experience" when asked what he's actually DONE during his gajillion years of holding public office...(emphasis in italics provided by yours truly.)
Question: Provide examples of what you've done.
Turner: I bring more experience than any mayor in Racine history. Other mayors, one thing they had in common, willing to listen. I was a sergeant in Army for four years; had top military clearance. (huh? When he was in the service 35 years ago he had top military clearance....and that is an example of what he's DONE for Racine?)
Dickert: With all due respect, Bob has a lot of experience. But we need leadership. Racine has consistently been one of the worst-rated cities for crime and jobs in Wisconsin. When we saw problems around St. Cat's, me and Uncle Jim went in and rehabbed houses... ditto on Sixth Street. It's not about what we talk about, it's what we do.
Follow-up to Turner: What are the specifics of your experience? (kudos to this moderator--for an actual accountability question!)
Turner: I have been a part of all decision making in Racine for past 28 years....finance chairman, lakefront development, when St. Mary's was moved, most all improvement downtown started years ago. I've been a part of every decision made in Racine over the past 28 years, the good and the bad. I can't be any clearer.
No, he can't be any clearer. Fact of the matter: as pleasant a guy as Bob can be, he hasn't done anything. The Capitol is filled with seat-warmers who make just as much money as the dedicated men and women who work hard to enact change. Note the lack of specific examples from a man who's had tremendous opportunity to help create a safe, viable community over the last 28 years. In fact, Bob's decisions (actual VOTES) in the legislature punished job providers with higher taxes, more regulations, less options to provide health insurance by allowing small employers to band together. He's a staunch opponent of changes in the bureaucracy of the school system. I mean STAUNCH.
So, at least I appreciate his candor in admitting he's been a part of the "bad" decisions as well as any "good ones." Let's check figures here: Racine's unemployment has increased over the last 28 years, the quality of our school district has been in strict decline, crime has increased, etc....Now, do I blame him for all of this? Of course not. But when he jumps in and claims how "experienced" he is and how he had a part in "every decision made in Racine," he inserts himself into the Accountability Line.
Here's a great comment from Dustin Block (one of my biggest fans while I was a Senator....I'm now removing my tongue from my cheek.):
Turner's line that he has an advantage because he has access to the Legislature's floor rings hollow. If access to the floor is so important, why didn't Turner get KRM passed as a legislator?
Right on, Dustin. I nearly laughed out loud at his bravado claim that he'll have "access to the floor." Who cares?! I watched former legi's skulk around the floor of the Senate during our session days, and it was more about catching up on gossip than any lobbying! Good God. He's ON THE FLOOR now! Bob, if you want something done, do it NOW!
I could go on and on here. As I tend to do with my posts--although, I think you have to grant me a quasi-pass, since I'm a woman and we tend to use more words than necessary...
Anyway, Racine can choose to continue the downward course they've been on for 3 decades by electing someone who claims to have "led" them on this same course for the same period of time. Or, they can choose someone else.
To the Jody fans who will jump on me for not including her in this post: It's only for the reason that I'm evaluating the debate from the other nite. Nothing else.